| Less Favorable Working Terms for a Civil Engineer |
|
Less Favorable Working Terms for a Civil EngineerAhmed’s residence permit was revoked and he fought for it in an temporary injunction. The Foreigners Office refused to grant him a residence permit because Ahmed allegedly was working as a civil engineer at less favorable terms than Germans. The The plaintiff entered Germany in 1989 to study with the appropriate permit. He studied medical engineering and passed his exams. After securing himself a job with a potential employer, he applied for a permit to follow this employment in 2003. With his application, he submitted a job offer from his prospective employer. This offer contained a monthly salary of € 1,800 for a work time of 38.5 hours for the probation time and afterwards a salary of € 2,000 for 13 months per year. After several interim permissions (Fiktionsbescheinigungen), his residence permit was not prolonged and a new one was not granted. The Chamber of Commerce of Hamburg, which had to be heard, saw no public interest in Ahmed’s employment because regardless how his salary was calculated he earned significantly less than a comparable German or European employee with the same qualifications. The court considered that the Foreigners Office correctly decided not to prolong his residence permit nor to grant a new permit to Ahmed. There were no grounds in favor of his application. Ahmed argued that since the offices took so long to come to a decision, Ahmed’s boss lost the customer that was to finance his position. Therefore, his salary had been reduced. He had already started looking for a new job and applied quasi as damages that he been given another year to search for a job – pursuant to §16 IV During the hearing, the chamber of commerce quoted from its expertise that a monthly salary of € 1,100 for 20 hours of working time did not even come close to local conditions or to any tariff. The chamber could not approve an employment under these conditions as they conflict §39 II no. 2 Ahmed further argued that if the offices had instructed him in good time that his residence application could not be granted because of the low salary, he would have surely found a different one or at least negotiated better conditions with his current employer. He the claimed that the negative consequences be eliminated. However, the court held against this argumentation that even if there were such claim it would not have any merits because he was to be employed for less favorable conditions than Germans. Ahmed’s last argument / application was based on “extraordinary hardship” (außergewöhnliche Härte) – as per §25 IV 2 |
| Last Updated on Thursday, 12 February 2009 16:47 |
| Outside Germany? Want to call or chat with a lawyer? Please use Skype PrimeCall! |
|
|
Advanced Search |
|
| Download Area |
Comments